<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SimpleDateFormat: Performance Pig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedwick.com/blog/2008/04/simpledateformat-performance-pig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedwick.com/blog/2008/04/simpledateformat-performance-pig/</link>
	<description>Technologists Who Speak Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.thedwick.com/blog/2008/04/simpledateformat-performance-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-19054</link>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedwick.com/blog/?p=131#comment-19054</guid>
		<description>note that performance is bad because SimpleDateFormat has a calendar instance as a member and it is allocation of the calendar object that is expensive. This is also why it isn&#039;t thread safe - if 2 threads change the calendar date or timezone or something at once the formats returned will be inconsistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note that performance is bad because SimpleDateFormat has a calendar instance as a member and it is allocation of the calendar object that is expensive. This is also why it isn&#8217;t thread safe &#8211; if 2 threads change the calendar date or timezone or something at once the formats returned will be inconsistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

